*edited: actually, e scenes of e accidents were much closer than i thot..really close and both were at the same turnings..one on e pavement, e other on e road..
on a more serious note, 2day has been an eventful day
pok pok's mum got into an accident at almost exactly e same location as where pok pok fell off her bike last sunday..off by a couple of metres? but she's fine..just tt i think she got bullied by these 2 stupid taxi drivers lah..
pok pok is mean
pok pok is officially boycotting Comfort taxis, esp the old light blues one, esp esp those in the sengkang-punggol area, yeah no much such taxis 4 me!
why? u must be thinking..
i think they were meanies! not exactly sure what happened but the car got damaged - e corner of the back bumper. e 2 stupid meanies' 1st reaction: "It's your fault! you drove 2 near our taxi!" their taxi was not damaged at all and i think they tried 2 get away with it..said tt "oh, nvm, it's ok, u dun need to pay us, lucky u meet us, other ppl might try 2 rip u off.." what crap! they shd pay us $$
told my mum "yah, we know u in a hurry cos sending kids to sch, but cannot nv see then turn.." the taxi was parked by the road on the left and my mum was turning left..as she turned, the end of the car wld hv gotten further away from the taxi, so even if she had been 2 near 2 e stupid taxi, she wld hv gotten the front part hit, not the back..so how likely was it tt she hit their taxi? anyway, the taxi was not damaged..usually, the moving object wld damaged less and the stationary one more..cos the moving object has more force..why is tt their taxi is not damaged at all but our car is?
my mum was just 2 blur and shocked i guess..din take down the car plate or their names..they cld hv gotten away with it, cos my mum did think it was her fault due to what they said..but one of them was 2 greedy..gave my mum this namecard with his name and contact no on it, cos he wanted her to go repair the car at the repair shop, which he had a share of
No comments:
Post a Comment